EU still hesitant on military force enhancement after Afghanistan - Rokoto

EU still hesitant on military force enhancement after Afghanistan

It doesn’t appear the EU will be moving quickly to boost its own military capabilities in the wake of a hectic Afghanistan withdrawal that left some insisting Europe needs to better stand on its own.

In a meeting of EU defense ministers on Thursday, the first since western forces fully exited Afghanistan, there was not enough political will to make any promises on dramatically changing the bloc’s military posture — despite several countries insisting Europe cannot continue to rely on the U.S.

“I cannot ensure you anything,” said Josep Borrell, the EU’s top diplomat, in a press conference after the informal summit in Slovenia.

Borrell was responding to a question about whether he could vow that the current debate over boosting the EU’s military wouldn’t end up like past ones — proposals and pledges, followed by inaction. Specifically, the question referred to an agreement EU leaders made in 1999 to develop a military force of 50,000 to 60,000 soldiers by 2003 — a commitment that never materialized.

That failure has left many skeptical that the latest debate will lead anywhere.

Still, the end of the Afghan war has revived the question of how the EU can better determine its own military fate.

In the final days of the withdrawal, several European countries wanted to extend the departure deadline in order to evacuate more citizens and allies. But the U.S. insisted on sticking to its own timeline — forcing the Europeans to comply. The Taliban takeover in Afghanistan has also left European officials fretting about a new migration wave and a resurgence of regional terrorism.

European Council President Charles Michel captured the debate in a message published after Thursday’s meeting.

“The chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan forces us to accelerate honest thinking about European defense,” he wrote.

But the EU has a poor track record on developing joint military forces. Currently, the bloc does have so-called battlegroups, composed of 1,500 soldiers, but these brigades have never been deployed.

Thursday’s meeting was the first occasion to gauge whether EU countries would actually be keener to make stronger military commitments after Afghanistan. The first results don’t look promising. If anything does change, diplomats stressed it will take time.

Borrell, himself a champion of boosting the EU’s defensive capacity, pointed to ongoing discussions for an upcoming strategy document that will outline the EU’s military ambitions and threats. Those talks, he said, could help move the bloc forward on the subject.

“I don’t have the security but I have hope” about the discussions, he said. He expressed hope that by November, when the first draft is slated to be revealed, the EU “will have created enough common understanding of the challenges … in order to mobilize the will of the member states.”

One proposal on the table would be to set up small rapid deployment brigades of 5,000 soldiers.

But “it’s not about troops, it’s about political will,” said Latvian Defense Minister Artis Pabriks, speaking on his way into the meeting.

There’s also the chance that a smaller group of countries — a “coalition of the willing” — could move forward without the bloc, essentially breaking the EU’s impasse.

“We must become more capable of action,” said German Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, speaking at the end of the meeting.

Kramp-Karrenbauer said Berlin will suggest triggering a never-before-used article in the EU treaty, “which could set up a coalition of the willing” or “joint exercises of our special forces.” She said other nations like the Netherlands, Portugal and France want to participate.

The idea of using this approach, which would allow the breakaway group to still use the EU flag, has been floated for months among officials. And Borrell said “we’ll explore this possibility.” But he also stressed that one of the problems with this route is that EU countries must still give unanimous approval to allow the smaller group to set up joint forces under the EU banner.

Unanimity on foreign policy is often an obstacle for the EU, even for joint statements.

Hans von der Burchard contributed reporting.

 74 total views,  2 views today

GearBest WW
Ivacy VPN [CPS] WW
Ru vds WW
Boutiquefeel WW
Bellelily WW
Libertex [CPS] WW
Eneba Many GEOs
Floryday WW
Newchic WW
EnglishDom
Ivrose WW
Norton [CPS] WW
ChicMe WW
Vialet [Android, CPS] Many GEO's
Spread the love

Leave a Reply

×

Hello!

Click one of our representatives below to chat on WhatsApp or send us an email to rokoto.net@gmail.com

× How can I help you?
%d bloggers like this: